5 Steps to Save Energy
by Mike Grande, Infratrol Manufacturing Corp.
January 1, 2010
|
|
| Figure 1. Even a 50 or 100°F (28 to 56°C) reduction
in operating temperature can potentially save thousands of dollars in annual
operating costs.
|
|
Process optimization is one of the easiest ways to save
energy and money on new or existing ovens or drying equipment.
In a heat processing application, the process oven is
designed, rated and commissioned for a specific production capacity. This
capacity (pounds per hour or pounds per load) typically is a conservative number
reflecting worst-case loading at maximum temperature -- conditions typically is
never encountered in actual production. This inflated rating makes your oven
consume more energy even under normal conditions when the extra capacity is not
being used.
By carefully analyzing the product being processed, and then designing and
adjusting the equipment to more accurately match that process, you can reduce
your energy use and save money, sometimes dramatically.
1. Determine Your Product and Process Requirements
First, determine your anticipated product loading. For
continuous process equipment such as conveyor ovens and web dryers, it is the
pounds per hour of product or material being processed through the oven. For
batch ovens, it is the pounds being processed in each batch. Remember to add in
the weight of the conveyor belt, baskets, carts, fixtures, etc., that carry the
product. Be as accurate as you can and do not put a service factor on your estimates.
That should be added later.
Next, calculate the amount (if any) of solvent or water to be evaporated in the
oven or dryer. Start by measuring the wet vs. dry weight of a sample of
material. The difference in weight represents the evaporated solvent or water.
An alternate method when dealing with a uniformly applied coating is to measure
the coating thickness and multiply it by the surface area on which it is
applied. By multiplying this by the percentage of solvent that the coating
contains, the actual solvent content (per part or per hour) can be determined.
The final step is to multiply by the number of parts per batch (for batch
ovens) or parts per hour (for continuous ovens).
No matter what method is used, it is critical that the solvent measurement is
done accurately. The solvent load has a drastic impact on the exhaust rate,
which has a direct effect on the heat input (and energy use) of the equipment.
In many instances, the exhaust system consumes even more energy than heating
the product itself. Solvents are flammable and must be properly exhausted in
accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 86 to
prevent unsafe concentrations from accumulating in the equipment.
In the case of a water-based coating, there are no mandated exhaust
requirements. Instead, the exhaust rate should ideally be determined by
testing. To test, start at the minimum exhaust setting (using the damper or
variable-frequency drive), and perform drying tests with successively greater
exhaust rates until the parts dry properly. The key is to exhaust no more air
than is necessary.
For gas-fired ovens, additional exhaust is required to remove the products of
combustion, which also removes heat from the oven and can result in wasted
BTUs. For gas-fired ovens that utilize excess air burners -- and most do --
this wasted heat is based on the maximum burner rating regardless of whether it
ever operates at its maximum. Therefore, an oven equipped with an oversized burner
costs more to operate than an oven with a properly sized burner. When
purchasing a new oven, make sure the burner is sized to match the heat
requirements of your process with a reasonable safety factor added.
2. Calculate the Heat Input Required
Using the product and process data, calculate the heat input
required to perform the heating operation for your specific parts, process and
coating. Or preferably, choose an oven supplier that can do it for you.
Often, these factors are only roughly (and conservatively) estimated during the
proposal stage. But, when the oven is purchased and enters the design stage,
the details must be finalized. When this is overlooked, the equipment often is
overdesigned and wastes energy and money during operation. When purchasing an
oven that is a standard offering from the manufacturer, make sure these
calculations are done. This step is sometimes ignored or forgotten.
3. Be a Smart Coating Shopper
|
|
| Figure 2. Reducing the solvent content allows
you to reduce the oven exhaust rate, which minimizes energy consumption.
|
|
Before selecting a paint or powder coating, consider not
only the cost of the coating itself but its cure temperature. The temperature
can have a large impact on energy consumption (figure 1). Ask your oven
supplier to calculate this because even a 50 or 100°F (28 to 56°C) reduction in
operating temperature can potentially save thousands of dollars in annual
operating costs.
Consider the solvent content of the paint you are selecting and consider a
water-based coating if possible. Reducing the solvent content allows you to
reduce the oven exhaust rate, which minimizes energy consumption (figure 2).
Ask your oven supplier to compare the exhaust rates and operating costs for
coatings with different solvent contents. Reducing the solvent content by 30
percent, for example, may allow you to reduce your oven exhaust rate by 20 to
25 percent, resulting in significant energy savings.
When using a solvent-based coating, consider a solvent monitor, also known as
an LEL (lower explosive limit) sensor. It will monitor the atmosphere inside
the oven and protect against the buildup of potentially flammable solvents,
allowing you to reduce the oven exhaust rate by up to 50 percent without causing
a safety hazard. This can drastically reduce your energy use, especially for
high solvent applications.
4. Apply A Safety Factor Only Once
Apply a safety factor only after you have calculated the
required heat input. A common mistake is to apply a service factor to the
solvent load, then add another one to the load weight, and yet another to the
maximum operating temperature. Compounding the problem is that your oven
supplier will probably also apply a service factor when calculating the exhaust
rate and selecting the burner or electric heaters. The accumulated effect often
is a significantly overdesigned system that may be more expensive than
necessary to operate.
5. Startup and Adjustment
|
|
| This wood drying system is most efficient when running at
its maximum design capacity of 6,900,000 boards per year. When operating at
reduced throughput, the BTU consumed per board is greater than at maximum
throughput.
|
|
During startup, adjust the equipment as closely as possible
to the actual requirements. Do not heat your product longer or hotter than
needed.
When adjusting the exhaust system, do not roughly estimate the damper or
variable-frequency drive settings. Instead, take actual exhaust flow
measurements to ensure the oven is exhausting no more than the required air
volume. Don’t let all your effort in optimizing the equipment be wasted by
haphazard setup.
Existing Ovens
These five steps can be performed on existing equipment as
well as new. In fact, some of the greatest energy savings opportunities are
found on existing ovens. Because new equipment is not needed, the investment is
minimal and the return on investment is usually favorable. In addition, your
state may provide an energy-efficiency rebate (up to 100 percent in Wisconsin,
for example) for the cost of a consultant hired to perform the necessary
assessment. Additional rebates (up to 30 percent in Wisconsin, for example)
also might be offered for the cost of labor and materials required to make
efficiency improvements.
With a few simple steps you can optimize your thermal process to save energy
and money, increase your bottom line, and effectively deal with rising energy
costs.
|
By: Gary Grande
Posted: January 18, 2010 7:28 PM