|
|
| Figure 2. Section A (top left) shows a balanced heat/cool zone. Section B (top right) shows cool gain two times too large, but maximum heat and cool capacities balanced. Section C (bottom left) shows cool capacity twice that of the heater and cool gain in need of adjustment. Section D (bottom right) shows the correct balance of proportional bands by making the cool gain equal to 0.5. |
|
Figure 2 shows the heat growing to 100 percent as the temperature falls by one proportional band. Likewise, the cooling power grows to 100 percent as the temperature rises by one proportional band.
Figure 2A also shows the cool power matching the heat power for the same temperature deviation. When you have optimized the proportional band for heat delivery, the same proportional band will be optimum for positive temperature deviations; that is, if full cool output is equal to full heat output.
In the event of unbalance of heating and cooling capacity, an adjustment called cool gain is used to restore that balance for best control performance (figures 2B, 2C and 2D show unbalance).
This arrangement is versatile, well proven and cost effective. You can adapt it for other applications such as reactors and vessels that have contents generating exothermic heat.
I’ll have more on split-range applications next month.