This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Home » Authors » Chris Jensen, Emerson, and H.P. Slater
Christopher Jensen is a senior advisor with the professional services team of Emerson Automation Solutions. H.P. Slater is an independent consultant. Emerson Automation Solutions, Round Rock, Texas, can be reached at 512-834-7039 or visit emerson.com.
When reliability gains from predictive maintenance begin to plateau, shifting your focus to condition monitoring can yield productivity gains and improved plant performance.
Often, the implementation of a predictive-maintenance (PdM) program is based on identifying imminent failures and preventing them — or by predicting a best estimate of an asset’s remaining useful life.
